Chapter 29 — Verification and Validation Governance¶
29.1 Purpose¶
This chapter establishes the constitutional governance framework for Verification and Validation (V&V) within the Engineering Intelligence Platform.
Verification and Validation Governance ensures that all engineering artefacts produced under Engineering Baselines are objectively verified, validated, and supported by auditable evidence prior to release.
The objective is to ensure engineering correctness, completeness, consistency, and fitness for intended use.
29.2 Definition¶
Verification confirms that an engineering artefact satisfies its specified requirements.
Validation confirms that the resulting engineering solution fulfills its intended operational purpose.
Verification answers:
Was the engineering artefact built correctly?
Validation answers:
Was the correct engineering solution built?
Both activities are mandatory engineering governance functions.
29.3 Authority¶
Verification and Validation Governance derives its authority from:
Engineering Constitution
│
▼
Approved Governance System
│
▼
Engineering Baselines
│
▼
Verification & Validation Assets (AVP)
Verification assets shall not establish governance authority independently.
29.4 Objectives¶
Verification and Validation Governance shall ensure:
- engineering correctness;
- engineering completeness;
- repeatable verification;
- objective validation;
- evidence-based acceptance;
- release readiness.
29.5 Scope¶
Verification and Validation shall apply to all Engineering Baselines, including:
- Engineering Specifications (SP)
- Interface Contracts (IC)
- Architecture Decision Records (ADR)
- Hardware designs
- Software implementations
- AI components
- Security mechanisms
- Configuration procedures
- Release packages
No engineering artefact shall bypass verification.
29.6 Verification Assets¶
Verification assets may include:
- Verification Plans
- Test Specifications
- Test Procedures
- Inspection Reports
- Review Records
- Compliance Checklists
- Acceptance Reports
These assets collectively form the Architecture Verification Package (AVP).
29.7 Verification Lifecycle¶
Verification activities shall progress through the following lifecycle:
Plan
│
▼
Prepare
│
▼
Execute
│
▼
Review
│
▼
Accept
│
▼
Archive
Each stage shall produce controlled evidence.
29.8 Acceptance Criteria¶
Acceptance shall require objective evidence demonstrating that:
- applicable specifications are satisfied;
- required interface contracts are fulfilled;
- architectural decisions are implemented consistently;
- identified nonconformities are resolved or formally accepted.
Acceptance shall not rely solely on subjective judgment.
29.9 Verification Traceability¶
Verification assets shall maintain traceability to:
- Engineering Specifications (SP)
- Interface Contracts (IC)
- Architecture Decision Records (ADR)
- Configuration Records (ACM)
- Release Baselines (ARP)
Traceability shall support impact analysis and audit.
29.10 Nonconformance Management¶
Engineering nonconformities shall be:
- identified;
- documented;
- evaluated;
- resolved;
- verified.
Where resolution is not immediately feasible, formal disposition shall be recorded.
All nonconformance records shall remain traceable.
29.11 Governance Compliance¶
Verification and Validation activities shall comply with:
- Engineering Constitution Rev.1
- Approved Governance System
- Engineering Baselines
- Configuration Management Procedures
Verification shall evaluate engineering compliance without modifying constitutional governance.
29.12 Chapter Summary¶
This chapter establishes Verification and Validation Governance as the constitutional assurance mechanism of the Engineering Intelligence Platform.
It confirms that:
- all Engineering Baselines require objective verification;
- validation confirms engineering fitness for purpose;
- verification evidence is maintained through the Architecture Verification Package (AVP);
- acceptance decisions are evidence-based and fully traceable;
- constitutional governance remains stable while engineering quality is continuously assured.